news-13092024-142410

UK Businessman Faces FCA Charges for Operating Illegal Crypto ATM Network

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK has taken a groundbreaking step by bringing criminal charges against Olumide Osunkoya, a 45-year-old Londoner, for operating an illegal network of crypto ATMs. This marks the first time the agency has imposed money laundering laws on unregistered crypto activity, signaling a significant crackdown on illicit cryptocurrency operations.

Background on the Case

Osunkoya had applied to the FCA for permission to operate as a crypto asset exchange provider in 2021 through his company, Gidiplus Limited. However, his application was denied by the agency. Despite this setback, Osunkoya continued to run multiple ATMs from December 29, 2021, to September 8, 2023, during which the network processed a staggering 2.6 million pounds. This blatant disregard for the FCA’s regulations ultimately led to criminal charges being brought against him.

In a press release issued on September 10, the FCA stated, “The charges mark the FCA’s first criminal prosecution relating to unregistered crypto asset activity under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLRs).” The agency’s joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight, Therese Chambers, emphasized the severity of the situation, warning that using crypto ATMs could potentially facilitate money laundering on a global scale.

Consequences of Illegal Crypto ATM Operations

The implications of operating an illegal network of crypto ATMs extend far beyond financial misconduct. Criminals can exploit these machines to launder illicit funds, evade regulatory scrutiny, and engage in other illegal activities. By allowing unregistered crypto ATMs to proliferate, individuals like Osunkoya enable criminal enterprises to thrive in the shadows, posing a significant threat to the integrity of the financial system.

Moreover, the unauthorized operation of crypto ATMs undermines consumer protection measures, as users may unknowingly engage with illicit actors who seek to exploit their financial transactions for nefarious purposes. This lack of oversight not only jeopardizes the safety and security of individuals using these machines but also erodes trust in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Legal Ramifications and Enforcement Actions

In addition to the money laundering charges brought against Osunkoya, he also faces allegations of forging government documents to establish his illicit enterprise. Specifically, he has been accused of violating the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981, further complicating his legal predicament and potentially leading to additional penalties if found guilty.

Osunkoya is scheduled to appear in court on September 30 to answer to the charges levied against him. The FCA’s swift action against illegal crypto ATMs underscores its commitment to upholding regulatory standards and combating financial crime within the cryptocurrency space. By shutting down unregistered ATMs in March 2022 and initiating enforcement measures against illegal operators like Osunkoya, the agency is sending a clear message that illicit activities will not be tolerated.

While Osunkoya is the first individual to face money laundering charges for operating a network of crypto ATMs in the UK, he is not the only offender to be targeted by the FCA. Previously, Habibur Rahman was also subjected to criminal charges for operating a single crypto ATM, highlighting the agency’s proactive stance against illegal cryptocurrency operations.

In conclusion, the FCA’s prosecution of Olumide Osunkoya for running an illegal network of crypto ATMs represents a significant milestone in the regulation of cryptocurrency activities in the UK. By holding individuals accountable for their involvement in illicit operations and enforcing stringent penalties for non-compliance, the agency is taking a decisive stand against financial misconduct and money laundering within the burgeoning cryptocurrency sector. As the case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the consequences that await those who flout regulatory guidelines and engage in unlawful activities within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.