**DeFi Drama Unfolds: Usual Protocol Faces Backlash Over Protocol Update**
In a shocking turn of events, the Usual Protocol, a rising star in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space, has found itself at the center of a storm. A sudden alteration to the redemption mechanism of its yield-generating token has sent shockwaves through the DeFi community, leading to a significant sell-off on secondary markets. This unexpected move has left investors reeling and liquidity providers scrambling to make sense of the situation.
**The Unforeseen Change**
On January 10, 2025, at 10:26 p.m. UTC, the DeFi world was rocked by news of a protocol update that caught many off-guard. The USD0++ token, a locked-up version of the protocol’s stablecoin USD0, experienced a sharp decline in value on the Curve decentralized marketplace, plummeting below 90 cents from its stable $1 price. This sudden drop triggered a domino effect, causing the protocol’s governance token, USUAL, to nosedive by as much as 17% before making a partial recovery.
**The Root of the Problem**
The sell-off was directly linked to a modification in the redemption mechanism of the USD0++ token, introduced by the Usual team without prior warning. This change allowed investors to redeem their locked-up tokens early at a discounted rate of 0.87 USD0, undermining the 1:1 exchange rate that had been a cornerstone of the protocol. As a result, confusion and chaos ensued among users, with many expressing outrage at the lack of communication and transparency surrounding the update.
**A Lesson Learned**
The debacle at Usual serves as a stark reminder of the inherent risks associated with DeFi products that promise high yields through token incentives. As industry experts caution, clear rules and unwavering trust are essential for maintaining market stability and preventing widespread panic. While the episode has undoubtedly shaken investor confidence, it also presents an opportunity for the DeFi community to learn and grow from this experience.
**Expert Insights**
Prominent figures in the DeFi space have weighed in on the controversy, offering valuable perspectives on the implications of the Usual Protocol debacle. Ignas, a respected DeFi analyst, raised concerns about the protocol’s handling of the situation, questioning the decision to introduce a feature that contradicted the established norms of the ecosystem. Similarly, Patrick McKenzie, an advisor to Stripe, highlighted the importance of maintaining pegs and ensuring that users fully understand the mechanisms at play in DeFi platforms.
**Moving Forward**
In response to the backlash, the Usual team issued a statement acknowledging the missteps in communication and pledging to improve transparency moving forward. The protocol plans to activate a revenue-sharing mechanism for governance token holders and address the concerns raised by users regarding the redemption process. While the road ahead may be challenging, the Usual Protocol remains committed to fostering a culture of openness and accountability within the DeFi community.
As the dust begins to settle, the true test for Usual and other DeFi projects lies in their ability to rebuild trust and regain investor confidence. Only time will tell if the lessons learned from this episode will pave the way for a stronger, more resilient decentralized finance ecosystem.
—
Krisztian Sandor recently graduated from NYU’s business and economic reporter program as a Fulbright fellow and worked with Reuters and Forbes previously. Originally from Budapest, Hungary, he is now based in New York. He holds BTC and ETH.