The footballer Hatem Ben Arfa was claiming over 7 million euros to his former club. On 16 December, the prud’hommes has ruled : there will be nothing.
1-0 for PSG. The player Hatem Ben Arfa has lost against his former employer to the prud’hommes, Paris Saint-Germain, where he remained for two seasons (2015-2017) for 500 000 euros gross per month, of which 425 000 salary and 75 000 bonus ethics. The star of the football has spent two months without playing a victim, he says, “a leadership that wanted at all costs to get rid of him”.
COVERAGE >> Ben Arfa against PSG : what was said to the prud’hommes
On October 16, his lawyer said that the champion, who has already experienced a number of international clubs would have launched an Emir : “I am pleased to be able to talk to you because I have more trouble talking to my president.” A small phrase that would have upset the hierarchy of the PSG, the alive as an affront : Ben Arfa was relegated to the bench, condemned to watch others play. His lawyer did not refer to a “bore-out”, since the player must train, but the inability to benefit from various bonuses that are only paid to those who are on the ground.
Your support is essential. Subscribe for $ 1 support Us
“He is pretending…”
It does not claim that a euro for moral harassment, but also 100 000 euros of reminder of their salary and “bonus ethics”, the footballer’s demand for payment of 6.3 million euros for implementation of the gap and loss of chance of individual premium, 700 000 euros for setting the gap and loss of chance of award collective and 590 000 euros for setting the gap and loss of chance with the oem.
Read our complete file
Carnets de prud’hommes
“She worked for the Republic in motion, but you will need to remove the scale Macron” “permanent among us, the employee sells his creations on the Net” “let’s look at the e-mails of its hierarchy to see if his superior merit prison”
From his side, the lawyer PSG highlights the casualness of the player : “everyone knows that he doesn’t train enough, that he pretends”, insists it. Deftly, she released the star of the stage for the plunge in its contractual relationship : “The power of direction is given to the coach to select a player. There is no harassment. It is not maintained in the reserve group in a position to be unjustified”. She says : “The PSG has not failed to fulfil its obligations in respect of his non-selection is decided because of a failure of the training and its weak sports performance”. At the end of the argument, Ben Arfa has tried everything : “Me, in my head, I was sure that I was going to play. I was the best at training. I was there to play”. Counsellors labor processes have not been convinced.