news-17082024-192250

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign has appointed chairs for the presidential transition team, which is drawing attention for its strong pro-crypto stance. The team, led by Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick and WWE co-founder Linda McMahon, is signaling a clear direction for the Trump campaign, positioning itself as a pro-crypto administration in contrast to the current administration’s more cautious and regulatory approach to the crypto sector.

The appointments of Lutnick and McMahon, both significant donors to Trump’s reelection effort, along with Ohio Senator JD Vance and Trump’s sons Eric and Donald Jr., suggest a transition process heavily influenced by the former President’s inner circle. The team is expected to play a pivotal role in shaping the policies of a potential second term, particularly those related to digital assets and blockchain technology.

On the other hand, Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign is closely associated with figures known for their cautious and regulatory approach to crypto, such as Brian Deese, former Director of the National Economic Council. Deese is often cited as an architect of “Chokepoint 2.0,” a regulatory framework that targeted the banking relationships of crypto companies. His involvement with the Harris campaign indicates that a potential Harris administration might continue the current administration’s stringent oversight of the crypto industry.

In contrast to Trump’s pro-crypto stance, Harris’ team, including Deputy Director of the National Economic Council Bharat Ramamurti and Treasury Undersecretary for Illicit Finance Brian Nelson, may not be as supportive of the crypto industry. Ramamurti has been a vocal critic of the crypto industry, while Nelson has pursued legal actions against crypto developers in recent years. Additionally, SEC chair Gary Gensler, known for his strict regulatory stance on digital assets, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo, rumored to be Harris’ pick for Treasury Secretary, could lead to policies aimed at curbing what they see as the excesses of the crypto market.

Trump’s Pro-Crypto Transition Team

Former President Donald Trump’s transition team, led by Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick and WWE co-founder Linda McMahon, is signaling a strong pro-crypto direction for the Trump campaign. The team, which also includes Ohio Senator JD Vance and Trump’s sons Eric and Donald Jr., is expected to play a pivotal role in shaping the policies of a potential second term, particularly those related to digital assets and blockchain technology.

Lutnick, a well-known Bitcoin advocate, and McMahon, who has criticized central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), bring their expertise and perspectives to the transition team. Both significant donors to Trump’s reelection effort, their leadership suggests a transition process heavily influenced by the former President’s inner circle. The team’s emphasis on pro-business and pro-crypto policies aligns with Trump’s vision of a more business-friendly and innovation-driven administration.

The inclusion of Trump’s sons on the transition team hints at the possibility of them taking on more significant roles in a potential second Trump administration. Both Eric and Donald Jr. have been vocal supporters of their father’s policies and have increasingly been involved in the campaign. With their involvement, the transition team is expected to influence the direction of the potential second Trump administration, particularly in shaping policies that could favor the crypto industry.

Harris’s Regulatory Approach to Crypto

In contrast to Trump’s pro-crypto stance, Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign is closely associated with figures known for their cautious and regulatory approach to crypto. Brian Deese, former Director of the National Economic Council, is often cited as an architect of “Chokepoint 2.0,” a regulatory framework that targeted the banking relationships of crypto companies. His involvement with the Harris campaign indicates that a potential Harris administration might continue the current administration’s stringent oversight of the crypto industry.

Another key figure in Harris’ team is Bharat Ramamurti, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council and a driving force behind “Bidenomics.” Ramamurti has been a vocal critic of the crypto industry, particularly in its current form. His influence in a Harris administration could lead to policies aimed at curbing what he sees as the excesses of the crypto market.

Additionally, Treasury Undersecretary for Illicit Finance Brian Nelson has been instrumental in pursuing legal actions against crypto developers in recent years. SEC chair Gary Gensler, known for his strict regulatory stance on digital assets, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo, rumored to be Harris’ pick for Treasury Secretary, could further intensify regulatory scrutiny on the crypto industry.

Many believe that Harris’ team may not be as supportive of the crypto industry and would likely maintain or even intensify regulatory scrutiny. Despite rumors of shifting to a more favorable stance for crypto, the Harris campaign has yet to publicly show support for the sector.

In conclusion, the contrasting approaches of Trump’s transition team and Harris’ regulatory approach to crypto highlight the potential policy differences in a potential second Trump administration or a Harris administration. While Trump’s team signals a strong pro-crypto direction, Harris’ team is associated with figures known for their cautious and regulatory approach to the crypto industry. The decisions made by both camps could have a significant impact on the future of digital assets and blockchain technology in the United States.