in Rabelais approach runs the risk of clashing with the crc, to which all the faithful in our country. The crc states that every child has the right to freedom of religion. This freedom means the freedom to have a belief and the freedom not to believe.
a Child is born not with a particular language or a particular culture. When They claim that the parents are restricting their children’s freedom by, for example, choose a denominational school for their children, it is the right thing. Parents to restrict their children’s freedom when they get to those in a particular language, or to raise them in a similar manner, including in a secular culture.
This guide is must to take into account the child’s growing abilities. This means that the child is in line with their age and maturity, to assume more responsibility. A new-born infant could not himself take the responsibility for making decisions which affect it. When the child reaches the age of majority, have the total responsibility for the business. In between, there is a trend, in which the child, step by step, to practice, to decide and to take responsibility for all of the important issues.
people Think They parents should educate their children in some sort of laboratory, with a public culture in which the state is responsible for that?
It is the responsibility of the parents to provide a space for development, but that does not mean that the parents are not allowed to influence their children – quite the opposite! To get to the part of the parents ‘ outlook on life and their way of life is a prerequisite for the children will be able to make their own decisions. This will include the parents ‘ beliefs or religious affiliation, or icketillhörighet. That the convention affirms this in article 30, which says that children from ethnic minorities may not be deprived of the right to be ”accompanied by other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language”.
the Convention is ensuring that the parents or the extended family have the primary responsibility and right to educate their children. Think of They be mothers and fathers to educate their children in some sort of laboratory, with a public culture in which the state is responsible for that?
the Crc must be read as a whole. The training is provided, as well as in public schools in private schools of various disciplines have to contribute to their child’s development and maturity in various areas. What is required of both the parents and the school that the child is not kept in a specific view, or to be denied the right to become acquainted with other ways of living and viewing life. This is a pre-requisite for the understanding and tolerance of others in the programme referred to in article 29, the to give. To say that the religious parents and faith schools at a higher level than the ” in the parents, and the public schools were to fail at this point, is a preconceived opinion that is not supported.
In our article, we offer our expertise in the crc will be the Swedish team by providing guidance and training on the local level, and support to government agencies and regulators. We also provide Humanists with this expertise, in order to understand the meaning of freedom of religion or belief.
<