in the Framework of what is bygglovspliktigt and what is not, it has become more and more difficult to understand in recent years. This is partly because the number of exemptions from the requirement for planning permission has been implemented, in part, to a judgment of the Supreme court of justice (HD), a year or two ago.
with the reform of attefallshusen come, that is to say, the right to build a small house on its own plot of land without planning permission, was also in the startbesked one of the builders got to the houses, and could not be appealed by the neighbors.
in his ruling that there was a breach of the european Convention on human rights, to refuse to the neighbors to the right of appeal startbeskeden. This is a practice that is contrary to what was said, after the reform, with the attefallshusen was carried out.
The following is an example of the snårighet of the regulatory framework in which the government wants to get rid of.
” We can see that there is a risk that this hampers the construction of housing so that it does not dare to insert new projects into the sea, says housing minister Per Bolund (MP), to the ROTOR.
Photo: Magnus Hallgren
to make it clearer what is bygglovspliktigt and what is not. However, it is not intended to be a more byggåtgärder shall be subject to the requirements of the planning permission, rather to the contrary.
” It’s not a report that seeks to regulate. We have a clear statement from the parliamentary majority and that there will be more actions that can be done without the requirement for planning permission, ” says Bolund.
But in order to do this, we need to be clear in the bygglovsregelverket, so you know what it is, is that the case, ” he adds.
the government of the Centre party and the Liberal party, it is also stated that the regulatory framework needs to be an increase in construction, and also in order to promote the development of rural areas.
We believe that investigators can ensure that you get more consistency, but it will also remove the requirement in the planning permission – for example for those who would like to build a coffee shop or a riding school adjacent to the farm, ” says the minister for housing.
Or, to make it easier to build the outside of the agglomerations, the Swedish planning area, ” he says.
the Carl-Oskar Bohlin, however, that the terms of reference for the investigating officer are varied, and likely to create more hassle but will also lead to measures that do not require planning permission in the future are going to need it.
“It’s possible, at least not to rule it out,” he said.
Bohlin think that the government should have provided a clearer expression of the fact that the focus should be changes in the rules. Among other things, he thinks that some of the measures that do not require a building permit, but a notification requirement, should be allowed to avoid, precisely, the obligation to notify, for example, attefallshus.
” we need is not an obligation of a garden shed in under 15 square meters in size. It should be possible to apply for a attefallshus as well, ” said Bohlin.
the study will be completed by the 31st may of the next year. None of the investigators are yet to accomplished, but it will be in the near future,” according to the minister for housing.
to Read more: She wants to change the rules for the construction of housing.
for more information, see the ” Five proposals for the simplification of construction.
