almost no one will pay for 2.490 sek to see a cardiologist on a start-up Called Care. “Why not?” Does not match with their famous price-lists? Yes, but those who are rich enough to pay out of my own pocket to have already taken out a private health insurance.
With a private insurance company, you have access to is Called Care specialist. However, the insurance is not nearly as private as the name suggests, the whole is Called the Cares of a business concept rests, indirectly, on a snyltande in the public sector in general and the nhs in particular.
today, we have hundreds and hundreds of private providers who are financed by the public sector, but at the same time, enter into a contract with an insurance company, and let their customers join the queue. Without this, the nation-wide system of parasitic the public was not supposed helprivata is Called Care are able to build their business in insurance customer, because some of these had scarcely been on it is private-got to make it on their own. In addition, the insurance has been very expensive, but today’s multi-faceted “free-riding” on the public.
the second one is Called Care insurance customers funded by the government through favourable tax deductions. In July 2018, while a law on personal income tax, which was in the private välfärdsindustrin to be going through the roof. However, on the one hand, was due to the policies at the same time, tax-deductible for the business, and, on the other hand, the Swedish federation of Insurance negotiated away half of the preferential taxation through the Tax authority, which strangely enough, is not addressed to anyone other than the aforementioned special interests.
the bottom line: tax exemptions are probably greater now than they were prior to the legislation, which was supposed to put an end to them.
this is Called Care, is based on the fact that the insurance policies are taken out by the Swedish confederation of professional Associations, ASYLUM, and the government vårdgranskarna of the county councils ‘ mutual insurance company, as I revealed in Today’s Medicine for a couple of weeks ago. These organisations now need to be questioned: do they really have to be active legitimitetsskapare to the players who are pushing in the direction of a US-inspired model of the united states?
Yes, a public health care system of the highest quality, based on a plan, and a good working atmosphere, which is prevented by the chaos of privatisation, and the halvprivatiseringar in american health care. Public health services are based at the same time, it added to the resources. It would be easy for a country that is getting richer and richer, but instead we see a steady fall in tax ratio, in part due to a decline in skattevilja and non-tax revenues as a result of the quasi-private systems of private health insurance as the ultimate example of this.
the Authors are proud and dishonest. They name the clinic after a woman who took a stand for the vulnerable groups, however, are directed to opposite groups. They are talking about the health care needs, creating health care for our wallet.
<
