the Swedish public employment service is in a state of chaos. In many parts of the country, forced the municipalities to take over, but neither the resources nor the expertise. Individuals who are without any support. The media has recently been filled with accounts of the situation. Experts, trade unions, representatives of local authorities, all of the matches. One entry, among many, is that Lars Calmfors, in the magazine of the world of work, ”Not in our wildest dreams could we have imagined the current state of chaos.” A no-holds-barred, but a fair criticism of just how bad this is.
to the Left, repeat his threat of a no-confidence vote against the minister of labour, Eva Nordmark (S). The SD and KD are connecting to it. Lack of confidence is well justified. However, the target is in the wrong is selected. Eva Nordmark has not contributed to the current state of affairs.
on The 5th of november, Nyamko Sabuni, the Liberal party leader, is a review of the januariavtalets provision of a complete reshaping of the public employment service, it shall be implemented in full by 2021 at the latest.
”We are at the end of 2019, what it looks like in 2021 at the latest, nobody knows,” he said. The criticism is about the way it looks now, not how it might look in 2021, it will pretend to Stefan Löfven is not on.
for Decades the whim of ever-new ideas, one of which is more unrealistic than the other, it needs to be replaced with unity, peace, and the long-term.
It is in these circumstances that the Party gave to Eva Nordmark two weeks to make a change. As a result of the requirements. It is understood, not least by the frantic pace of activity has been going on since the Party spoke of their threat two weeks ago: the statement about the ”presence of the whole of the country, but the long-term funding, some of the meetings with the stakeholders, the new director-general, the promise of a working group of the parties. Measures that do not alleviate the chaos that prevails to this day.
This is the first place to Stefan Löfvens the actions that need to be looked at. Why do all of the obvious preliminary steps have been neglected? For the government, and the prime minister’s work, there are guidelines in the constitution, section 7, section 2 reads: ”For the consideration of government business should the information and opinions obtained from the relevant authorities. The information and opinions expressed should also be to the extent that it is required to be obtained from the local authorities. Also, corporations and individuals, to the extent that it is required to be given an opportunity to be heard.”
This applies both to the question of whether the change is to be made, and how it will be implemented.
the best documentation was in the form of a commission of inquiry was appointed in 2016 at the latest. The report proposes far-reaching changes in labour market policies and the public Employment service of the organization. The konsterarar well as to the governance of the public employment service through the years there have been more detailed, ever-changing and short-sighted. The aspiration to raise the employment service of the political battle is clear-cut, behind the polite phraseology.
However, in december, changed conditions, and the investigation went directly into the trash can. The government had put forward a proposal for a budget, which, according to the government, a so-called provisional government, had, in principle, the neutral adjustment of the budget, compared with the year 2018. The parliament agreed, however, is not the approach taken and the budget was voted through, was cut in the public Employment service’s administrative appropriation by more than 10 per cent.
the Government’s representatives, in the Decisions of the members, that ”the new government will need to come up with a supplementary amending budget with the necessary corrections to be made without delay’.
Some of the options available to lay off employees and close the office was not. As a result of the current chaos has been caused.
the Government chose, instead, to take charge of the immediate situation, to concentrate on the januariöverenskommelsen. The speed of political negotiations, is outlined and a new model of labour market policy. The new model will be fully implemented by 2021. The government have, therefore, without the need for further investigation, in fact, decided to carry out a complete reorganization of the system.
the Swedish public Employment service was commissioned to write a report on the practical implementation. The report was presented at the beginning of november. It has so many, and so obvious reservations, it is clear that this reorganisation is not possible to carry out the application of the time.
the Conclusion is obvious. The responsibility for the situation that has arisen is that of Eva Nordmark, but with Stefan Löfven.
And of course, the ferocious cuts in the allocation for the public employment service was made, and the choice of words, behind the parliament’s decision, pointing the event to something that is similar to the januariöverenskommelsen. However, this is not a sufficient excuse. The parliament’s decision did not include any schedules. Nothing prevented the government from focusing on that to clear up the situation in which the parliament prescribed the cuts, obviously, would be likely to have.
now Some people might say, ”But januariöverenskommelsen, then, it is, of course, categorically.” Yes, of course, is the answer. However, there is an agreement between the parties. Such arrangements do not relieve the government from the requirement of the preparation of the cases in which the Government are travelling.
the committee on the constitution shall, to the spring of the need to consider this specific issue in the handling of the notification of the decision of the government, and the lack of preparation for this reform.
the demand on the Eva Nordmark’s departure is obviously a reason to return to the government. The resignation of the government, certainly, as a result of the election, it would appear that as a result of the Decisions the requirement to obtain a majority in the parliament.
This development is very poor, independent of formal omissions, which the prime minister is responsible for. It would, of course, will inevitably lead to a repeat of the last year of the circus.
and Now, the time has come for the parties, and each of the eight, to comply with the requirement that the lifting of labour market policy over party politics. For decades the whim of ever-new ideas, one of which is more unrealistic than the other, it needs to be replaced with unity, peace, and the long-term.
This can be a first step. However, the trust is gone. Of all of the municipalities, the social partners, the job-seekers. Of the population as a whole, and from them by the Employment of the employees who are left behind.
now, What is needed is a multi-step process:
It is the first to be completely clear of all the ill-conceived reformatory , and clean up the chaos that had been created. To add to the resources that are needed in order to create the peace and quiet that is at all possible to create with today’s immediate circumstances.
The second is to revise the arbetsmarknadsutredningens well-worked-out proposal. , in the context of the situation, and then commit to it.
It is the third, and then to think very carefully about how to reform finally, it should look like: , and also to take into consideration of how, and within what period of time, it can be carried out.
the Order is an often used expression. This is what is greatly needed in this respect.
<
