Climate change is one of today’s most important issues. The conservatives share of the government’s high ambitions in this area, but if Sweden is to achieve the goal of nettonollutsläpp by the year 2045, and to be a leading voice internationally in more than necessary. The government’s climate change policy is not sufficient and the long-delayed climate change action plan, which the government announced earlier in the week, made up a large part of the old proposal. It is a failure of the government’s policy on climate change.
the Emissions of Sweden, the decrease is not fast enough, if we are to achieve our climate goals, it must be stressed that the environmental protection agency after the agency last week announced the official statistics on emissions in the year 2018 at the latest. There is nothing wrong with the government’s ambitions in terms of climate change, but many of the most important reforms are the subject of criticism for being expensive and inefficient. For example, the Klimatklivet that it costs two billion a year. The government needs to do more, but most of all it needs to do the right thing, to accelerate the setting of the community in a green direction.
a Lot of them are already in the moderate policy. This is particularly important if the proposals to reduce emissions in the transport sector and industry, which together account for two-thirds of the country’s emissions. The government is proposing to elektrifieringsstrategi of the transport sector and the new investments in technologies that reduce the industry’s emissions. It is a laudable initiative, but they are far from being sufficient.
It is noteworthy that the government did not account for the climate benefits of the proposals, despite the fact that the klimatlagen requires an explanation of the policy and how it is going to lead to the climate goals are to be achieved.
As an alternative to the government’s elektrifieringsstrategi we have a concrete proposal in the parliament, which reduces the emissions of fossil fuels from transport and industry. We spend ten times as much as the government, in order to be able to quickly build up a network of charging stations in the whole of Sweden, to name but one example. In this way, more and more individuals and companies choose electric vehicles, and ellastbilar. This, together with support for industries that are investing in new technologies, which will reduce or eliminate the emission, is proposed, which does make a difference to the climate of the here and now.
It is, therefore, remarkably, the government does not account for the climate benefits of the proposals, despite the fact that the klimatlagen requires an explanation of the policy and how it is going to lead to the climate goals are to be achieved. Isabella has said that the current policy instruments are not sufficient to reduce emissions enough. How will climate change targets be met, if the government does not want to introduce you to the benefits of the policy?
We should not distrust the government’s commitment to the issue of climate change. However, it is not enough to be like, just as in any other policies climate change policies, be a systematic, results-driven, and lead to a reduction in emissions. This failure of the government.
and so it deserves, Sweden, and the climate-a new climate policy for the 2020-ies.
<
