the Debate on the digitisation of the uk, and the old ideas, and concerns that comes up again and again. The not-so-rarely in the form of an idea of how it would be acted on, by Björn Rosengren of the article about the ipo of Telia ab in 2000.
this is The second part of Telia, the state portion of the responsibility for the fiberinfrastrukturen, and a private telecommunications operator that is able to compete in a free market. I’m going to concentrate here on the second part of the article, which, I believe, Björn Rosengren, has not really kept up with the times.
the Project is the Digitization of increasing the competitiveness of the University. Swedish academy of engineering sciences completed in 2019, beating, among other things, the use of digital communications in Sweden, are not of the quality which could reasonably be expected to, and that the digital communications systems are no longer built according to the ”stuprörsprincipen,” as in the old Liverpool. Instead, the current system is similar to a lasagna, in which all parts are interdependent and overlap. The latter argued that both the contractual conditions of the security have to take account of the fact that No one can build a system in which you are the owner and hence, to explicitly control all of the inventory in the supply chain.
As a bonus, it allows for diversity between the various components, to avoid the so-called ”Single point of failure”. Thus, the systems are more stable, more robust, and more secure as compared to if you built, or are building, their own vertical stuprörslösningar.
as a result, a modern communication architecture based on a diverse set of solutions at each level of the value chain. Need to be reliable and stable communication based on the use of all the available fiber-optic, regardless of who owns it.
today, looking back on the privatization of Telia, and to think that the state would be maintained (fiber) network, and start to wonder if the government of the day to impose such a separation, the failure of a number of reasons.
The most important thing is that this is the only network that would never be able to be just as robust and secure as the practices that can be created by networks of many operators, both private (such as Telecom), and government (such as municipality-owned, so-called Metropolitan area networks).
the modern communication architecture must be as a mother. It can be based on the 1900 talstänk with the passing of the centralised, monolithic solutions.
<
