Ann-Marie Åsheden objects with our op-ed, that we are being far too kind to the media and have given up all hope of recovery. She is right in saying that we have to focus on the need to make the audience understand how the medielogiken is not explicit on what the journalists could have done differently.
and that informed citizens are a key component. And it is precisely in order to help people are not fooling themselves, but will gain knowledge and understanding of the key influencing factors that we have chosen to use this approach. To some extent, this means that we have given up all hope of being able to ”change from within”.
” But we have not, as a matter to bring honor and glory to the current pressure of journalists; rather, we feel that we are doing the media a favor by creating an understanding of how it actually works. We modify it at times, hated mediekritiken and try to convert it to a more enlightened criticism.
for anyone who thinks they have something to tell you are forced to one way or another to finish the message so it was also the great-grandfather’s time.
She has at any time made no secret of the wise, the point of view of citizens, must take responsibility for their actions in order to subdue the propaganda on the net.
It’s not like we’re giving a free pass to the mass media to pursue the same path, with the carelessness and exaggeration. However, we do have empathy, with an independent effect, as the industrialization process is on its way to be transformed into factory workers. We’ve written a lot in the book, in which we are trying to begin to make sense of this.
<
