about 50 of insurance, and the contributions that make up the Swedish social insurance system is at the core of the Swedish welfare state model, which is based on the principle that all contribute and thus share the costs and risks involved. The social system rests, therefore, on the premise that the citizens are working, and by the social security contributions and income tax finances the social security funds.
When the Swedish parliament created a network of the income of insurance and residence-based contributions have been in Sweden for a national economy that, to a significant extent, could be controlled politically. Both the socialist and social democratic parties of the center-right parties were, at the time, a good opportunity to influence the level of economic activity from one year to the next.
during The migration, which was allowed to come from other european countries, where the inhabitants fairly quickly, got the job and became net contributors to the welfare state. The control of the individuals who were allowed to come in, was a straight-forward, since the vast majority came from countries with functioning civil registration and accuracy of data.
it was the victim of his / her first effort, and with the accession to the EU in 1995. Suddenly it was the swedes have the right to reside anywhere in the EU, and in the same way, was given to all residents of the EUROPEAN union have the right to reside in Sweden. Since about one-half of social security benefits are residence-based, raised already at that time voices that argued that insurance arrangements should be reviewed, with the occasion of the entry into the EU. It all came to nothing.
In the context of Sweden as a part of the schengen treaty in 2001, the vanished, the control of which made their way into the country through other eu member states, so as to make it, once again, voices were raised now, it was certainly time for a review of the social insurance system. From this, it was nothing.
When the EUROPEAN union expanded to include countries from Eastern europe, raised with the then prime minister Göran Person (S), with a warning finger, as he is in Today’s Echo, said: ”the Free movement of workers, we would like to have, but it is not the social tourism sector. There, we must not be naive.”
working ten hours a week in order to be eligible for any social benefits. Why set up a state commission of inquiry under the Berit Rollén, who was given the task of the system. She didn’t want to change the rules so that only full-time job, would give a right to the socialsystemets benefits, or, alternatively, that the permit only be granted for a single year at a time. It all came to nothing.
the expiration date of the current system of residence-based contribution of the long since expired, but the system got its final break in 2015, when the folkbokföringens integrity is no longer guaranteed. Today the population register, and the control of the migrating closest to the source. We are no longer in control of who lives and resides in this country.
We do have a large amount of co-ordination number, which gives the right to a social residence-based grants to any person the identity of which is not shown. A Swedish citizen, has been assigned to the persons in whose identity we have not been able to determine, and have in many cases been assigned to the parallel of Swedish identity.
as of the individuals who are leaving the country, but while still maintaining settlement-based compensation and for which the payments without any further examination can be passed by direct debit to non-resident banks. This makes the problems even more.
in recent years, a series of revelations about fraud in the system shown, there is an open goal for those who wish to abuse the social security funds. And the abuse of the system, in the end, the less resources are available for those who are most in need of social support. In spite of this precarious situation, it appears our political parties are just as confused in the face of the problems of the day, which at the entry into the EU, in the Schengeninträdet, or when the EU expanded to the east.
” So we can’t have that. The politicians have to deal with the question of the coordination number and the residence-based contribution to the system to ensure the citizens ‘ expectation of a stable and robust social security. As we can see, there are only three realistic options from which to choose, which is something we should avoid.
The first thing is to carry on as if nothing has happened, what has been the line of policy so far. This means that the charges for it will continue to rise in line with real wage growth at the same time as the replacement of the system becomes lower and lower. For example, was the treatment of the recipient the whole of the amount in 1999. In order to deal with kostnadskrisen of the social insurance system has been the policy for several years, stopped to calculate the price base amount at the rate of real wage growth. Therefore, the current genomsnittsinkomsttagare, only 84 per cent of the genomsnittsinkomsttagaren was in 1999.
The second would be to re-establish the state control of the remuneration, which is the case of unannounced visits, and job shadowing. This requires, however, that a number of authorities, re-establishes its presence throughout the country, or to procure a control from a third party.
The third would be to not even residence-based grants and to allow municipalities to receive a share of the social security contributions. This would allow for the verification of the beneficiaries and to allow for a cost-effective monitoring of those who are in receipt of income protection benefits, which include, in due course, it should be the government.
the Government and the parliament must, as soon as a new social security funds, which are adapted to the new conditions – or else we run the risk of a further strengthening of the current trend of increasing polarization and mistrust between the various groups in the country.
<
