the investigating officer, ms Westlund presented in the article, its proposal for the package in order to increase the production of american cars. The proposal’s main focus is a production of 30 to 40 cents per kilowatt-hour, only for biogas produced through anaerobic digestion of livestock manure.
There can be no doubt that the rötningsbaserad, biogas is an excellent product with a great climate, and the environment. Swedish biogas has been unable to compete with imported Danish on the basis of double financial support is, of course, is a problem. So far, we are in agreement. However, we are strongly of this proposal is the right way to go.
Westlund writes in his article that there is a ‘ technical potential to produce around 15 TWh of biogas produced from the anaerobic digestion process, and at least an equal amount by the gasification of, for example, skogsrester”.
the Investigation into the three different packages and premiums from, and by 2021 at the latest. The problem is that such assistance only be directed towards the rötningsbaserad biogas: they are not technology-neutral. It could be compared to, for example, wind power should be given to the allocation of the electricity, but the electricity produced from the biomass. The principle of technology-neutrality within renewable energy production, must, of course, also apply to renewable natural gas.
the Current proposal does not, perhaps, the current situation of competition between the Swedish and the Danish biogas production. But already on 20 and 21 may, the Danish aid is likely to be replaced by a different scheme. An obvious question then is what such a change means that the Swedish bio-gas?
the commission of Inquiry proposes two additional management tools that includes other technologies other than anaerobic digestion. However, there is no clear what are the levels of support provided, or are to be introduced. This is likely to delay the development of a biogasmarknad beyond the rötgasen, and will create additional uncertainty for the industry, as the demand for the clear, and over time, the stability of the regulatory and support systems.
the Current proposal does not, perhaps, the current situation of competition between the Swedish and the Danish biogas production. But already on 20 and 21 may, the Danish aid is likely to be replaced by a different scheme. An obvious question then is what such a change means that the Swedish bio-gas? The plan is also creating, entirely without justification, of a false competition between the two for effective and sustainable conversion technologies, anaerobic digestion, and gasification.
both of These technologies have a great potential to complement each other and together bring to the market, the greater the amounts of biogas than those who support only the to, from, and, thereby, to contribute to the transformation of the Swedish energy supply.
Westlund, lift the right samhällsnyttorna of rötningsbaserad cars. However, biomass gasification is a field of technology who is also able to contribute with great value. The technique can be used to process both the waste that is the residue from the forest, agriculture and renewable natural gas. All of the gasification of the biomass, may also provide as a by-product in the form of a bio-coal, which, for example, can substitute for fossil carbon in the production of iron and steel or direct-like landscaping, where it will remain for several hundred years. The gasification of biogas is also an entry product for the technology, which can provide other products, such as biofuels and chemicals.
In line with this development, the technology has also been refined, with higher efficiencies and new, more difficult types of biomass as a raw material. There are commercial gasification plants that produce a renewable gas (but not biogas from the digestate, as the digestion plants is left behind. We hope that the investigators are familiar with this exciting new development.
the Potential for gasification, in Sweden, is very, very good, and the investeringsvilligt capital is not a lack of production is made technologically neutral. Compared to the more established rötningstekniken is also in place. In Sweden, there are nearly 300 facilities for the production of biogas through the anaerobic digestion process. In particular, this concerns the municipal plants for the production of biogas at the treatment plants. They are the lowest-hanging fruit is already taken, and the potential for growth is limited and the additional capacity has, in turn, higher costs.
This will create the same competitive framework for the production of renewable gas, and then letting the market choose the technology that best fits the given local conditions. What do you do with the asa westlund’s proposal, which in its present form, most unfortunately, one-sided, the greatest impact on the profitability of the existing municipal rötgasanläggningar.
<
