We can say that it’s always been a concern to shift the focus from the object of study Crime, to ” our study”, it is Possible to rest assured the Crime?”. The scope of this line is limited, and we believe that it is important to highlight the concrete proposals emanating from the findings of the report to focus on, to defend one-on-one critique. .
the Report is reviewed by a highly qualified research scientists. The answers to the many questions that have been raised, we set out in the report, such as recruitment process, there are with, for transparency reasons. Please review the report, but even more so, we would welcome more studies that examine the Crime.
to Limit the participation of the Swedish research council for five years. . This increases the scope for new perspectives and a critical approach. The way in which our report has been received, is symptomatic of the effects of excessive long-term relationship with a Kind, can get.
make Use of researchers from other research disciplines other than criminology at a significantly higher level. Some criminologists seem to think that a Crime is called the highest point the council and the national council for crime prevention. There is a need for a much more extended competences, consisting of the researchers, in areas such as finance, information technology, forensic science, and the trafikbrottslighet. The effect of the great emphasis by criminologists, can hardly be said to have been the one to be avoided, in the case of proposals for appropriate measures in order to reduce the brottsutveckling, or to provide the politicians with relevant information regarding the same.
There is a need to raise the visibility of the choice of a reviewer, go to , to get a bigger brain circulation among those who are hired as reviewers, and reviewers ‘ comments on the final versions of the reports will be presented.
•
Return to the previous approach, with the author’s name on the front page of the reports. . Such an arrangement will increase the possibility of obtaining a more alternative point of view and to attract qualified researchers to the Crime, which is very much needed.
to Change the form of, and procedures for the internal review , the the financial reports.
Training for the staff of the Crime of the principle of public access and the importance of riding in this one.
the Ability to seek out the e-mail as a public record. should be much more than just a little over eight weeks in the past.
as of the additional specific needs that are outside of the beslutsmandat.
• * * * Make a decision on the organisation of the Crime which, in the greater comply with the recommendations of the government commission of inquiry on the Crime) from 2004. (SOU 2004:18).
set up the advisory board. , who decides on who is to conduct the requested study of the activities of the police. It is important that these decisions are not taken in by the police because there is a good chance that the important information is being suppressed/deleted in all these studies, in order to increase the chances of getting a renewed mandate.
but whatever we do, there will be those who put the effort into the media spotlight is not going to end up in Crime.
<
