In the two lines, which has been submitted to our article, it appears that they would rather see more reviews of Crime than the report from the linkoping university, to be examined by an independent operator. We do not see any contradiction there. On the contrary, we also raise in our article, we feel that it is important for our, and also other authorities, the activities to be reviewed. In a polarised debate, it is especially important to review, as well as the criticism, it is a reliable, valid, and objective.
among other things, the ability to work independently, experience or gender distribution among the investigators of the Crime.
We have made a contribution to the debate, to point out that we do not recognize ourselves in the description of our workplace, which is controlled, censored, or influenced by a tystnadskultur. This is the voice of the.
<
