In Denmark, investigates the Danish parliament trafikutskott, a division of Posten in a Danish and a Swedish part, in which the ROTOR has to be told.
And the former minister of finance Allan Larsson come up with a radical proposal: let Its go out of business and let the government buy-back of the English part of the bankruptcy estate.
in just a little over a decade after the merger of the Swedish Posten AB and the Danish Post Danmark?
The first thing to note is that it is often a good idea to merge the two companies with similar profitability problems for some time. And there were the two of the state postbolagen, the Swedish Posten AB and the Danish Post Danmark.
the Two companies, the president, the Record of Denmark Fritz Schur and for the Record, Marianne Nivert, was in 2009 to see how the former is profitable brevbäringen was no longer as profitable. Brevmängden reduced when the communication between the people, businesses, and government agencies were online.
the amount of letters, railed at the same time, that is, over 3,000 employees were entitled to three years salary at termination of employment – without obligation to work. These factors might be as a sinker for the combined company.
three years ago, was able to DN show that in fact the merger was in-fighting between Denmark and Sweden, and in a battle, which the danes won. Despite the fact that Denmark was one-half as large as that of the Post office, got the formula for half power. This meant that the board of directors must be unanimous in all major decisions.
the Idea is that the merging companies were from the Frits Schur. He also became the new company’s president, and soon appeared to be he protected, and Danish interests, rather than that of a joint-venture company.
also , Its in Denmark, been at a loss. They could, however, be balanced by Its Sweden-made a profit, albeit relatively modest, given the size of the turnover each.
in 2016, came dråpslaget. Its in Sweden made an operating profit of 824 million euro. Its in Denmark, made an operating loss of eur 1.9 billion in the usa.
And thus began the return leg of the international. Its need for a substantial injection of capital – a minimum of three billion dollars, claimed the lead.
“Mikael Damberg said that the crisis was a ”Danish” problem”. There was a Danish politician, who ran through all of the Danish households have a digital mailbox so that the communication between the public sector and the general public is done online. In other words, Danish political decisions, undermining the profitability of the company.
it was also that it was the Danish decision to provide the ”särliga the terms and conditions” to the list of 3,000 in those who had been made redundant. To cancel them would cost billions.
The international ”won” the uk, as the owners finally agreed to pay Its 2.2 billion in the process. Of these, 400 million are from the Swedish taxpayers, as well as 1.8 billion from the issue.
the Its, and a bankruptcy cannot be ruled out. Therefore, it will be better if the owners decide to share Its.
A divorce is not going to be easy. It’s going to be fighting over the division of their assets and how they will be measured. In addition, the root of the problem, the low profitability, and the disparate quality of the paketdistributionen.
However, there are also advantages to going their separate ways. Ultimately, it is the national policy decisions that are required in order to provide answers to a number of difficult issues, and therefore a clear ownership.
as a taxpayer, to go out with in order to ensure the delivery of the whole of the country?
” it Shall be a government postbolag to compete with private-sector to be a key link in the e-commerce?
If a state, like the English, is currently in the process of all communication between the government and its citizens to be digital, then who will take responsibility for the physical letters?
the reach of its owner, to be the answer, but if they are different, the answer can be that the company does not expect to live up to them.
this, Therefore, is a sharing of the Its is probably the least bad option. In this case the individual national companies have a chance to be able to adhere to their respective owners, the states, the political boss.
<
